The "no gc" crowd

JR zorael at gmail.com
Wed Oct 9 01:59:55 PDT 2013


On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 02:22:35 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> * Get Robert Schadek's precise GC in. Walter and I have become 
> 101% convinced a precise GC is the one way to go about GC.

An orthogonal question, but is Lucarella's CDGC (still) being 
ported? There's nothing mutually exclusive between a precise and 
a concurrent gc, no?


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list