The "no gc" crowd

[dennis luehring]

Am 09.10.2013 16:11, schrieb Dicebot:
> On Wednesday, 9 October 2013 at 13:57:03 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> They aren't opt-out for really any reasonable project though,
>> because code is reused and those people may want at least the
>> standard attributes to be set. Personally, the array of
>> attributes that can be applied to a D function is one of my
>> biggest pet peeves with the language. It gains me nothing
>> personally, and adds a lot of extra thought to the process of
>> writing a function.
>
> This is exactly what I was speaking about. It would have been
> much more easy if stuff was `pure @safe immutable nothrow` by
> default and one added `dirty @system mutable throw` on per-need
> basis after getting compiler error. But that is too late to
> change and this attribute inference may be only reasonable option.
>

i wouldn't say that - lets talk about D3 or even D4 - with breaking 
changes or else the language development will come to a full stop in a 
few months/years, if something is totaly wrong it needs to be addressed 
and changed, developers will follow