std.d.lexer : voting thread

Martin Nowak code at dawg.eu
Wed Oct 9 18:32:33 PDT 2013


On 10/08/2013 07:22 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
> We've had great stuff reviewed and merged thus far,
> but we also tend to end up having to make minor tweaks to the API or later
> come to regret including it at all (e.g. std.net.curl). Having some sort of
> intermediate step prior to full inclusion for at least one or two releases
> would be a good move IMHO.

It usually takes me a few month until I get to try a new module at which 
point it's mostly already voted and included.
So the current approach doesn't work for me at all.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list