The "no gc" crowd

[Sean Kelly]

On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 18:26:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> On Friday, 11 October 2013 at 18:22:46 UTC, Sean Kelly wrote:
>> It should.  Stripping "shared" just means that you'll be able 
>> to call any function available on the struct as opposed to 
>> only explicitly shared functions.  And the mutex gives you 
>> atomic behavior (assuming you use the mutex properly anywhere 
>> else you access the struct).
>
> How would it know which entity is associated with that mutex? 
> (== which to strip shared from)

It wouldn't.  I'm guessing it would just cast away shared.