Early review of std.logger
ponce
contaact at g3mesfrommars.fr
Mon Oct 14 12:59:03 PDT 2013
On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:39:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> As `std.logger` is still marked as "work in progress" this
> thread is less formal that typical pre-voting review. Goal is
> to provide as much input about desirable `std.logger`
> functionality and current state and let module author to use
> this information for preparing proposal for actual review /
> voting.
>
> Lets unleash the forces of constructive destruction.
Thanks for taking care of that.
My logger class logs warning in yellow and errors in red ;),
but honestly I will take _anything_ since the lack of std.logger
is a big problem right now for library writers.
I cannot write a nice wrapper for a C library without forcing my
pet logger implementation [that no one wants].
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list