Early review of std.logger

ponce contaact at g3mesfrommars.fr
Mon Oct 14 12:59:03 PDT 2013


On Monday, 14 October 2013 at 11:39:52 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> As `std.logger` is still marked as "work in progress" this 
> thread is less formal that typical pre-voting review. Goal is 
> to provide as much input about desirable `std.logger` 
> functionality and current state and let module author to use 
> this information for preparing proposal for actual review / 
> voting.
>
> Lets unleash the forces of constructive destruction.

Thanks for taking care of that.
My logger class logs warning in yellow and errors in red ;),
but honestly I will take _anything_ since the lack of std.logger 
is a big problem right now for library writers.
I cannot write a nice wrapper for a C library without forcing my 
pet logger implementation [that no one wants].


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list