Eloquently sums up my feelings about the disadvantages of dynamic typing

[simendsjo]

On Wednesday, 16 October 2013 at 19:19:26 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> On 2013-10-16 21:08, simendsjo wrote:
>
>> Remove all would probably be more in sync with getAttributes 
>> that
>> returns all attributes, but removing only the first would 
>> allow greater
>> flexibility. It's easy to remove all if you have a way to 
>> remove one,
>> but the other way around isn't as easy :)
>
> How would you remove all? I guess something like this:
>
> !@(foo, foo)
>
> But how can that be generalized? Unless we get a trait for 
> removing attributes.

Yes, sorry. I was thinking about a new __trait and running a loop.
Is this when we should be dreaming of the all-powerful AST macros 
again?