Early review of std.logger

[Robert Schadek]

On 10/21/2013 10:19 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2013 13:39:51 +0200, Dicebot wrote:
>
>> As `std.logger` is still marked as "work in progress" this thread is
>> less formal that typical pre-voting review. Goal is to provide as much
>> input about desirable `std.logger` functionality and current state and
>> let module author to use this information for preparing proposal for
>> actual review / voting.
>>
>> Lets unleash the forces of constructive destruction.
>>
>> ===== Meta =====
>>
>> Code:
>> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/1500/files Docs:
>> http://burner.github.io/phobos/phobos-prerelease/std_logger.html
>>
>> First announcement / discussion thread :
>> http://forum.dlang.org/post/mailman.313.1377180809.1719.digitalmars-
> d at puremagic.com
>
> std.logger is a good start, but I must admit I do not like the way it is 
> architectured. I use Java's Logging and Log4J for years so naturally I 
> compare std.logger with these two frameworks (that are heavily used in 
> production).
unfamiliar or bad (details please).