More on C++ stack arrays

[deadalnix]

On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 20:04:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
wrote:
> On Thursday, October 24, 2013 21:07:16 deadalnix wrote:
>> On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 18:22:49 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
>> 
>> wrote:
>> > Agreed. But there's a significant difference between @system
>> > and illegal, and
>> > deadalnix was claiming that such init values were illegal per
>> > the language
>> > spec, which is what I was objecting to.
>> > 
>> > - Jonathan M Davis
>> 
>> I never claimed that. I claimed that the init value, whatever 
>> it
>> is, must be considered as valid. This is only loosly coupled 
>> with
>> void as init value.
>
> Then what do you mean by valid?
>

Code operating on the struct must handle that case. It is a valid 
state for the struct to be in.