std.allocator ready for some abuse

[Kapps]

On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 22:19:10 UTC, Kapps wrote:
> For CAllocator, I notice setting alignment is a property yet 
> does not return void. Does this not go against the idea of 
> @property? Perhaps it should be setAlignment instead?

Actually, this doesn't make sense because then it would not be 
possible to use CAllocator instead of an Allocator in a template 
as the type would be wrong. It still feels a bit odd that it 
returns bool to me, but I definitely see the logic now.