std.allocator ready for some abuse

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 10/24/13 3:19 PM, Kapps wrote:
> A couple of questions:
> Shouldn't most of these implementations be marked nothrow? I could be
> missing something here.

Oh yah, that's part of the whole "alpha" thing. Then, since most 
allocators are templated, I'm hoping language definition will catch up 
with me and just infer them most of the time.

> For CAllocator, I notice setting alignment is a property yet does not
> return void. Does this not go against the idea of @property? Perhaps it
> should be setAlignment instead?

Yah, I'll fix that. Thanks!


Andrei