std.allocator ready for some abuse

[deadalnix]

On Friday, 25 October 2013 at 01:10:24 UTC, Meta wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 October 2013 at 23:22:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>> The first thing I notice is that this module is dead unsafe. 
>> I'm not sure it belong to std. We should probably reserve that 
>> for a "guru" part of the standard lib. Putting some system 
>> function in the standard lib is OK, as they are packaged 
>> around concepts (range, array, algorithms, etc . . .) but an 
>> entire module dedicated to @system stuff seems like it belong 
>> to another place.
>
> std.unsafe.*?

uac.*

Many bonus points for who get this.