std.allocator ready for some abuse

Marco Leise Marco.Leise at gmx.de
Sat Oct 26 02:03:34 PDT 2013


Am Sat, 26 Oct 2013 00:11:13 +0200
schrieb Timon Gehr <timon.gehr at gmx.ch>:

> >> - "CAllocator". The name is non-descriptive/misleading.
> >
> > "Class Allocator" :o)
> > ...
> 
> Then its purpose must be allocating classes? :o)

I'm actually fine with that name, probably because I tend to
prefix my D reference types in that manner, too. 'I' for
interfaces, 'C' for classes and maybe 'A' for abstract classes.

-- 
Marco



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list