Heads up, g++ in Xcode 5 points to Clang

Joseph Rushton Wakeling joseph.wakeling at webdrake.net
Mon Oct 28 16:08:14 PDT 2013


On 28/10/13 21:22, Joakim wrote:
> Really?  The claims that llvm has a cleaner codebase, is easier to use because
> it's all properly split up into different libraries, and introduces new features
> like better error reporting: that's all "PR?"

It's my understanding from Iain's talks that the GCC backend is now much cleaner 
and friendlier than it used to be.  I don't know how that compares to LLVM, but 
it may be that reports of the relative cleanliness of the two codebases are out 
of date.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list