Dynamic loading

[evilrat]

On Monday, 28 October 2013 at 22:25:12 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
> On Sunday, 27 October 2013 at 08:08:08 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
>> Any progress?
>
> There is no way to do something best with llvm?
> I don't really understand why for static and dynamic libraries 
> we need rely on OS  implementation. llvm intermediate byte code 
> isn't fast enough translatable at runtime?
>
> Actual binaries format on Windows and Linux seems old and 
> limited, I dream of cross platforms compilers that are based on 
> binaries format that contains all necessary information to be 
> able to operate correct inlining,...

maybe our childrens will see it one day :)

> It's a real strength that VM based language have to be binary 
> inter-operable. A lot of Java developers don't see C/C++ as 
> portable languages just cause of the necessity to rebuild 
> binaries on each OS even their runs on same architecture.

to be honest, many C/C++ developers don't think it is portable, 
so Java developers are not alone here O_-