Dynamic loading

[Flamaros]

On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 04:28:24 UTC, evilrat wrote:
> On Monday, 28 October 2013 at 22:25:12 UTC, Flamaros wrote:
>> On Sunday, 27 October 2013 at 08:08:08 UTC, Steve Teale wrote:
>>> Any progress?
>>
>> There is no way to do something best with llvm?
>> I don't really understand why for static and dynamic libraries 
>> we need rely on OS  implementation. llvm intermediate byte 
>> code isn't fast enough translatable at runtime?
>>
>> Actual binaries format on Windows and Linux seems old and 
>> limited, I dream of cross platforms compilers that are based 
>> on binaries format that contains all necessary information to 
>> be able to operate correct inlining,...
>
> maybe our childrens will see it one day :)

It makes me sad :(

>
>> It's a real strength that VM based language have to be binary 
>> inter-operable. A lot of Java developers don't see C/C++ as 
>> portable languages just cause of the necessity to rebuild 
>> binaries on each OS even their runs on same architecture.
>
> to be honest, many C/C++ developers don't think it is portable, 
> so Java developers are not alone here O_-