DMD 2.064 changelog typo?

[Nicolas Sicard]

On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 20:56:02 UTC, monarch_dodra wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 October 2013 at 10:08:00 UTC, Sergei Nosov wrote:
>> I guess it's a good thing, it's available online. While 
>> looking through it, I also noticed that there are new 
>> functions 'stripLeft/stripRight'. I believe it would be more 
>> consistent to call those stripFront/stripBack.
>
> Yes, it would be, but they are also a generalization of the
> eponymous string functions. Naming the new functions
> "stripFront/stripBack" instead of "stripLeft/stripRight" would
> itself be the more inconsistent.
>
> For example:
> //std.string.stripLeft
> assert(stripLeft(" \tHello") == "Hello");
> //std.algorithm.stripLeft(R, E)(R r, E e);
> assert(stripLeft(" \tHello", ' ') == "\tHello");
> //std.algorithm.stripLeft(alias pred, R)(R r);
> assert(stripLeft!(Not!isLower)(" \tHello", ' ') == "ello");
>
> But you make a valid point.

How do these string functions handle RTL languages? Even for 
strings, 'front' and 'back' might be more appropriate than 'left' 
and 'right'.