Everyone who writes safety critical software should read this

Chris wendlec at tcd.ie
Wed Oct 30 11:49:28 PDT 2013


On Wednesday, 30 October 2013 at 18:35:44 UTC, Russel Winder 
wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-10-30 at 11:12 -0700, Walter Bright wrote:
> […]
>> Much effort in cockpit design goes into trying to figure out 
>> what the pilot would do "intuitively" and ensuring that that 
>> is the right thing to do.
>
> I've no experience with cockpit design, but I am aware of all 
> the HCI
> work that went into air traffic control in the 1980s and 1990s,
> especially realizing the safety protocols which are 
> socio-political
> systems as much as computer realized things. This sort of 
> safety work is
> as much about the context and the human actors as much as the 
> computer
> and software.
>
>> Of course, we try to do that with programming language design, 
>> too, with varying degrees of success.
> […]
>
> Has any programming language ever had psychology of programming 
> folk
> involved from the outset rather than after the fact as a "patch 
> up"
> activity?

Ruby, they say. Even if it's only one programmer they based it 
on. :-)


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list