Had another 48hr game jam this weekend...

[Manu]

On 1 September 2013 17:46, Nick Sabalausky <
SeeWebsiteToContactMe at semitwist.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 01 Sep 2013 06:45:48 +0200
> "Kapps" <opantm2+spam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, 1 September 2013 at 02:05:51 UTC, Manu wrote:
> > > One more thing:
> > > I'll just pick one language complaint from the weekend.
> > > It is how quickly classes became disorganised and difficult to
> > > navigate
> > > (like Java and C#).
> > > We all wanted to ability to define class member functions
> > > outside the class
> > > definition:
> > >   class MyClass
> > >   {
> > >     void method();
> > >   }
> > >
> > >   void MyClass.method()
> > >   {
> > >     //...
> > >   }
> > >
> > > It definitely cost us time simply trying to understand the
> > > class layout
> > > visually (ie, when IDE support is barely available).
> > > You don't need to see the function bodies in the class
> > > definition, you want
> > > to quickly see what a class has and does.
> >
> > This isn't something I've found to be an issue personally, but I
> > suppose it's a matter of what you're used to. Since I'm used to
> > C#, I haven't had problems with this. I've always felt that this
> > was the IDE's job, personally. That being said, perhaps .di files
> > could help with this?
>
> I see it as the job of doc generators.
>

Why complicate the issue? What's wrong with readable code?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130901/6d6f4ea7/attachment-0001.html>