obsolete D libraries/modules

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2013-09-01 20:10, Ramon wrote:

> Considering that a standard lib is rather close to (and by many
> considered part of) the language, there are, as in language
> design, many trade offs to be decided upon, generality and
> reliability weighing in much higher than "it can do everything
> including the kitchen sink and a colour picker".

That's why I don't use it since it doesn't fit my needs. Why should I 
reimplement something that is already available for me?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg