Had another 48hr game jam this weekend...

Manu turkeyman at gmail.com
Sun Sep 1 21:19:26 PDT 2013


On 2 September 2013 06:00, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com> wrote:

> On 9/1/2013 12:38 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
>
>> I know you seem to hate automation (because it sometimes fails), but
>> having each individual person waste hours on initial setup is much
>> worse than having a script which can potentially fail. At least the
>> script can be fixed once the bug is reported, and it can be tested.
>>
>
> Back in the bad old Datalight C days, I relied on the Microsoft linker
> which came on the DOS system disks. Unfortunately, Microsoft constantly
> changed it, even with the same version of DOS. Worse, numerous other
> Microsoft products came with yet other versions of LINK.EXE.
>
> All those linkers behaved differently.
>
> It was a frackin' nightmare to support customers with them. I used to have
> floppy disks packed full of just different versions of LINK.EXE.
>
> This drove me to get our own linker (BLINK.EXE). While it wasn't perfect,
> either, at least I could actually fix problems with it rather than throwing
> up my hands in rage being unable to control the situation.
>
> There's no way we can automate VC 2014 so its unpredictable configuration
> will work. All we can do is react after the fact.
>

MS always release preview versions to toolchain/workflow vendors though.
You just need to register interest to get access afaik.

I don't hate automation. sc.ini works out of the box with the default
> install of VS 2010.
>

I don't think my 2010 install is non-standard in any way...

What I need from you guys and your different VS installs is, for each one,
> a bug report with what is necessary to get it installed. Then we can add it
> to the modern version of my floppy disk "linker collection".
>

I posted my sc.ini in a prior post. I'll try and get Simon's from him,
since he was on 2012.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130902/635b3704/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list