Had another 48hr game jam this weekend...

[Manu]

On 2 September 2013 23:50, Andrej Mitrovic <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 9/2/13, Manu <turkeyman at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But I still barely see this as an inconvenience when compared to not
> being
> > able to read a class definition.
>
> How about not being able to read the include paths in VS? I'm talking
> about this:
>
> http://i.stack.imgur.com/0cTZG.png
>
> You can view 2 lines at a time. After almost 20 years they still
> haven't fixed this. Where is their core dev team that should make the
> IDE experience great?
>

Classic. Or the one where the find window gets wider and wider every time
you open it, until it's bigger than the screen...

Contrary to how it may seem, I don't actually love Visual Studio as hard as
you may think. I'd love for MonoDevelop perhaps to supersede it... but it's
just not there yet. Not by a long shot.
MS are doing their best to ruin VS with every revision. Myself and most VS
users I know tend to only update maybe 5 years after new releases, when
they're forced to because someone pulled support for older versions.

For me, I absolutely will not work without a symbolic debugger, and the VS
experience is basically unparalleled there. It's also industry standard, so
whether I like it or not, that's what I use, and I've adapted over many
years.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130903/6ef54a87/attachment.html>