Structs can't be zero bytes in size?

[growler]

On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 04:25:33 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev 
wrote:
> On Tuesday, 3 September 2013 at 03:57:09 UTC, growler wrote:
>> If I see code like this I expect a & b to have different 
>> addresses.
>
> Why? What do you need that assumption for? What will break if 
> the structs became 0-sized?

There's no real reason, it's just a personal preference. As I 
said I'm heavily influenced by a C/C++ background and as such 
would prefer a different syntax.