new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates
Iain Buclaw
ibuclaw at ubuntu.com
Sat Sep 7 12:19:25 PDT 2013
On 7 September 2013 20:04, Jonas Drewsen <nospam4321 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> 3. Parameter names need not match.
>
>
> I think we should be conservative and require that parameter names match.
> This will ensure that code will not break in the future if named parameter
> functionality is added to the language at some point.
>
What about the absence of parameter names in the declaration?
struct Foo
{
int bar (string, int, int);
}
int
Foo.bar (string str, int start, int end)
{
/* ... */
}
--
Iain Buclaw
*(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list