new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 09/09/13 20:05, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> I think DDOC should be improved to handle this scenario. Being able to generate
> docs with undocumented members would be great for internal development of the
> module. I realize that doesn't address all your problems, but I think that is
> the correct direction.

Better DDoc is always going to be nice, but come on -- that doesn't address the 
issue of looking at code in a diff or a copy-paste via chat software, and in the 
scenarios Manu has described, no one's going to have time to write documentation 
comments.

OK, you could have a DDoc setting to at least _list_ all elements of class 
interfaces etc., even if there's no doc comment, but that doesn't address the 
other factors.