new DIP47: Outlining member functions of aggregates

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 09/09/13 20:30, Gary Willoughby wrote:
> This is such a poor argument for changing and further complicating the language.
> There are so many ways to get a class overview *even* in plain text. I can't
> honestly believe this is the catalyst for this DIP.

I can understand anyone feeling that the costs aren't worth it, but I don't 
think it's ever good to dismiss battle experience of skilled developers, 
especially when it comes from scenarios that you or I may not have personal 
experience of.

I don't mind finding out I'm wrong (actually, I'd quite like to be in this 
case:-), but I'd like to understand how I could get the class overview in the 
plain-text scenarios described in my previous email.