Move VisualD to github/d-programming-language ?

[Paulo Pinto]

Am 16.09.2013 16:22, schrieb Bruno Medeiros:
> On 07/09/2013 23:35, Paulo Pinto wrote:
>> Well, if you want a production quality multi-platform IDE the only
>> options are InteliJ and Eclipse, both of which are not that well
>> received by most C and C++ guys. The target audience for D.
>
> Just because Eclipse is not well received by the C and C++ community
> (apparently - even that can be debated), that doesn't mean that is a
> reasonable appraisal of Eclipse. It might just be an outdated opinion.
>
> I understand Eclipse bashing by the Vi/Emacs/text-editor people, that is
> an ongoing, but familiar and understood debate that has occured many
> times before, and is not going away anytime soon I think. (and is really
> not about Eclipse itself, but text editors vs. heavyweight IDEs, etc.)
>
> But Eclipse bashing by people who use say, VisualStudio, that I don't
> understand. Last time I tried both toolchains, VS seemed as heavy and
> "bloated" as Eclipse (CDT) was. Yet CDT seemed quite ahead in terms of
> features, especially semantics-wise (open definition, code complete,
> etc.). Admittedly this was 3-4 years ago, and I only toyed lightly with
> C/C++ code, I didn't do any serious development. But I doubt the
> situation changed such that VS got much better than CDT, if anything,
> the opposite is more likely.
>
>

And bashing from people that use InteliJ, Netbeans and Eclipse, 
depending on the customer?

 From these three, Eclipse is the one that always gives me more 
headaches in terms of responsiveness, the workspace concept, build tools 
that don't make to external build tools, loosing metadata just because 
and unstable plugins.

--
Paulo