std.d.lexer: pre-voting review / discussion

[Dicebot]

On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 16:34:01 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 17 September 2013 at 15:31:00 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> Discussion has slowed down and thread is fading away.
>>
>> I personally have not noticed any crucial objections (ones 
>> that can't be figured out during normal pull request review 
>> process). Brian, what is your state on this? Is there 
>> something you want to add/change before the voting gets 
>> initiated?
>
> I had some comments that nobody addressed. Mostly about firing 
> several instances of the lexer with the same identifier pool.

Well, I suppose only Brian can address it :) I am only checking 
if there are no commonly repeated objections that are likely to 
ruin the voting. There are plenty of comments of course and I 
would recommend Brian to at least make some statement about those 
before voting but that is his call.

There is a possibility to mention one issue as a blocker when 
voting though, that will be taken into consideration when 
counting actual votes.