Bartosz Milewski seems to like D more than C++ now :)

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 9/20/13 11:21 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> On 20/09/13 19:41, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 9/20/13 9:28 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
>>> The canonical example would be something like,
>>>
>>>      foreach (i; iota(10)) { ... }
>>>
>>> which in theory shouldn't be any slower than,
>>>
>>>      foreach (i; 0 .. 10) { ... }
>>>
>>> but in practice is, no matter what the compiler.
>>
>> I think I know how to fix that. I hypothesize it's about using actual
>> increment
>> instead of a stored value "step" for the particular case when step is 1.
>
> Excellent, that'll be great to see :-)

http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11077

Andrei