D2 is really that stable as it is claimed to be?

Kapps opantm2+spam at gmail.com
Sat Sep 21 17:29:59 PDT 2013


On Saturday, 21 September 2013 at 20:00:52 UTC, Jakob Bornecrantz 
wrote:
> On Saturday, 21 September 2013 at 18:23:20 UTC, bearophile 
> wrote:
>> Zhouxuan:
>>
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11086
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=11010
>>> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=10970
>>>
>>> I've found and reported these bugs after about merely 100 
>>> LOCs written down.
>>
>> D is not claimed to be stable, or those claims are wrong.
>
> Then again _NOWHERE_ on the start page, the overview page
> or the download* page is the word stable found. On the other
> hand unstable for that matter, none of those pages really
> convey that shit _IS_ going to break every new compiler
> release, proceed with caution.
>
>
> * Stable is found there but referring to the latest GDC release.


I've found my code to not break very frequently anymore even 
using git head. The last thing that broke any of my code was the 
stringof change in git head, and that was a 2 minute fix. I think 
it's been 2-3 minor releases before that at least.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list