std.allocator needs your help
Andrei Alexandrescu
SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Mon Sep 23 07:16:27 PDT 2013
On 9/23/13 7:07 AM, Manu wrote:
> On 24 September 2013 00:04, Andrei Alexandrescu
> <SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org <mailto:SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org>>
> wrote:
>
> On 9/22/13 10:20 PM, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
>
> Am 23.09.2013 01:49, schrieb Andrei Alexandrescu:
>
> Hello,
>
>
> 2. Untyped allocator - traffics exclusively in ubyte[].
>
>
> Why "ubyte[]" and not "void[]"?
>
>
> It's the logical choice at this level.
>
> ubyte[] == "these are octets"
>
>
> Isn't that what void[] also means?
> Except it says "these are un-typed octets, ie, not a sequence of typed
> integers in the range 0-255".
I think void[] means "objects of unknown type".
Andrei
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list