std.allocator needs your help

[Andrei Alexandrescu]

On 9/23/13 1:04 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
> On 9/23/2013 10:08 AM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> I'm unclear on what void[] means starting from its semantics.
>
> I agree that it should be void[], as that represents (in D) a block of
> untyped data. void[] should be ideal for a primitive allocator.

Great, made that change, it all works. Does void[] make any promise 
about alignment?

Andrei