Bartosz Milewski seems to like D more than C++ now :)

[deadalnix]

On Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 11:32:18 UTC, renoX wrote:
> I'm not sure you understood my point: a 'normal' function takes 
> inputS and produce an output, in the notation: a,b->c you can 
> clearly see the inputS and the output with a minimum of 'syntax 
> noise' around them.
> In the notation a -> b -> c, the 'syntax noise' is bigger 
> (those arrows between the input parameters are much more 'heavy 
> on the eye' than a quote), and what does it bring?
> Nothing..
>
> It's the notation which makes the function type less readable 
> which I consider a mistake.
>

You are putting artificial barrier here.

a -> b -> c is a function that take a as parameter and return a 
function that take b as parameter and return c. The concept of 
multiple parameters and stuff like that exists only in your mind. 
You try to map a concept you have in your mind in the language 
when it DO NOT exist in the language.