std.allocator needs your help
Dicebot
public at dicebot.lv
Tue Sep 24 10:05:22 PDT 2013
On Tuesday, 24 September 2013 at 16:58:27 UTC, Peter Alexander
wrote:
> The cost of a few cycles really doesn't matter for memory
> allocation... If you are really allocating memory so frequently
> that those few extra cycles matter then you are probably going
> to be memory bound anyway.
It is true if you are using malloc. Not for pool allocator or
scratchpad allocator or similar performance-enhancing allocator.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list