John Carmack on Eclipse performance

Klaim - Joël Lamotte mjklaim at gmail.com
Sat Sep 28 06:26:35 PDT 2013


On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 1:23 PM, Paulo Pinto <pjmlp at progtools.org> wrote:

> - It is 4 years time until 2017, plus the time compilers will need to
> adopt it, how relevant in the industry would that standard still be?


This argument is not much valid anymore.
Most language or library features are implemented for testing before a
proposal is voted in (because of previous fisaco)
C++14 draft is fully supported in Clang at this time, and is even modified
real time from votes happening this week.

I mean, except if you work with Visual Studio, compiler adoption is not
really that long now.
The only real barrier is company policy. Now I don't want to work on a
company that impose artificial limitations on improvements
(other than time obviously).
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20130928/1345c6f7/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list