Increasing performance with static polymorphism (and other neat tricks) - blog post

srean srean.list at gmail.com
Tue Apr 1 00:15:59 PDT 2014


Not a question to you in particular, but dont know how to add to
a thread without replying.

I am very curious about the following (I think by the time I had
clarified my question Walter had left the building)

>> I have a slightly tangential question, repeating what I asked 
>> on HN
>>
>> Can't the destructor issue of scopebuffer be mitigated by using
>>
>>      hasElaborateDestructor( )
>>
>> For instance have two versions one with a destructor for non  
>> POD
>> and another without. The compiler dispatches to the appropriate
>> one at compile time. There should not be any loss in 
>> performance.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list