Community input for a new C binding generator project

[Dicebot]

On Wednesday, 2 April 2014 at 21:00:25 UTC, James Buren wrote:
> Clang has an API that I find difficult to understand, so I 
> can't really say what may be an issue for it. But I have heard 
> that it doesn't expose any of the macros defined during the 
> preprocessing phase.

libclang has both C and C++ API. Former has only limited exposure 
of macros, latter is much more capable. I doubt anything you may 
create with a custom parser can be more simple than libclang, 
unless not with comparable language support.