Specifying C++ symbols in C++ namespaces
Simen Kjærås
simen.kjaras at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 12:33:24 PDT 2014
On 04.04.2014 20:54, Dicebot wrote:
> On Friday, 4 April 2014 at 18:51:21 UTC, Simen Kjærås wrote:
>> I have to say I like Robert Clipsham's idea best:
>>
>> extern(C++) module nspace {
>> int foo(); // Is this also extern(C++)? I think it should be.
>> }
>>
>> extern(C++) module nspace {
>> module innernspace {
>> int bar(); // Also extern(C++), if we follow the example above.
>> }
>> }
>
> All solutions based on binding extern(C++) to some D qualification entity are
> bad because they confuse reader into thinking that `bar` is actually
> `nspace.innerspace.bar` and that should never happen.
I'm not entirely sure I follow you here. Is this what you mean?
extern(C++) module nspace {
int foo();
}
void main() {
foo(); // Either this does not work, (#1)
nspace.foo(); // or this does not work. (#2)
}
If so, is that really bad? I'd say the better choice is to make #2 work, as then
#1 can be made to work with a simple alias:
alias foo = nspace.foo;
If I'm far off into the fields of ignorance now, care to show me the way to a
better understanding?
--
Simen
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list