Recommendation: Compile DMD with More Warnings

Walter Bright newshound2 at digitalmars.com
Sun Apr 6 22:38:42 PDT 2014


On 4/6/2014 9:45 AM, Orvid King wrote:
> If you want, I have the results of a static analysis of DMD that I could post,
> as processed in 23 hours and 58 minutes by Intel's C compiler, using 10gb of RAM
> the entire time. If I can figure out how to have it not skip any methods (there
> were still a significant number that it didn't analyze due to complexity limits)
> I'll run it again and post the full results. In my basic look over the results,
> there were a decent number of them that may actually be bugs. (buffer overruns,
> and even a few instances of accessing memory after it had been freed)

Yes, please post.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list