Formal review of dtoh

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2014-03-27 12:27, Dicebot wrote:
> Right now it does not really look in shape for a formal review.
> Documentation is missing. Tool itself does not have help output and
> throws exception on plain "./dtoh" call. I see quite a lot of "FIXME"
> and "idea" comments in its source code. Missing internal DDOC comments
> at least for basic structures. In general it looks more like proof of
> concept than actual proposal.
>
> Concept itself looks reasonable though. Eventually I'd like to see it
> use dmd frontend as a library but parsing JSON output should do fine
> until such option becomes feasible.
>
> I don't really want to dwell deep into implementation right now because
> I think that before any further exploration can happen, tool must be
> made more friendly to collaborative work.

I fully agree with this.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg