A serious security bug... caused by no bounds checking.

[bearophile]

Steven Schveighoffer:

> No, the author of the @safe code expects bounds checking, it's 
> part of the requirements.

Take a look ad Ada language. It has bounds checking and its 
compilers have a switch to disable those checks. If you want the 
bounds checking don't use the switch that disables the bounds 
checking. Safety doesn't mean to have no way to work around 
safety locks. It means have nice handy locks that are active on 
default. In a system language total safety is an illusion. Better 
to focus on real world safety and not a illusion of theoretical 
safety.

Bye,
bearophile