The "@safe vs struct destructor" dilemma
Dicebot
public at dicebot.lv
Sat Apr 12 16:08:27 PDT 2014
On Saturday, 12 April 2014 at 22:02:26 UTC, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> *Now* doStuff can be marked @safe and enjoy all the special
> checks that @safe provides.
_and_ is terribly wrong because it is not guaranteed to be @safe
for all use cases, braking type system once used anywhere but
"special" functions.
I agree that @trusted functions should be as small as possible
but they still be self-contained.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list