Shared Library, that is when ?

[Joakim]

On Saturday, 12 April 2014 at 00:53:27 UTC, bioifornatics wrote:
> On Saturday, 12 April 2014 at 00:16:26 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
>> On Friday, 11 April 2014 at 23:15:13 UTC, bioifornatics wrote:
>>> Dear,
>>>
>>> I know vthat D community dev works hard. I would like to know
>>> when provide shared Shared Library will become a priority ?
>>> I know you could say do it ( i know … ) but my job is to 
>>> package
>>> tools. Sorry …
>>> Partial shared lib give too many random bug as this one:
>>> https://github.com/ldc-developers/ldc/issues/596#issuecomment-40141711
>>>
>>> Please finish this feature.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Kind regards
>>
>> I use DMD to make shared libraries on Linux all the time. Is 
>> there a reason you have to use LDC?
>
> Because LDC has a free license that is a nust have to be allowed
> to put a package into fedora. ( I package for fedora)

This question belongs in the ldc forum then.  I don't know all 
about how well ldc works with shared libraries on linux, but the 
recent ldc 0.13.0 alpha updates druntime with some better linux 
shared library support.  The commit you mentioned using was 
probably from the older 2.063.2 trunk branch: have you tried the 
newer 2.064.2 branch?