Formal review of std.lexer

Brian Schott briancschott at gmail.com
Mon Apr 14 14:19:01 PDT 2014


On Sunday, 16 March 2014 at 22:13:16 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On 02/22/2014 09:31 PM, "Marc Schütz" <schuetzm at gmx.net>" wrote:
>> But that still doesn't explain why a custom hash table 
>> implementation is
>> necessary. Maybe a lightweight wrapper around built-in AAs is 
>> sufficient?
>
> I'm also wondering what benefit this hash table provides.

The hash table was added by Dmitry a while back. I assume it's 
because he had numbers to back it up.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list