DIP60: @nogc attribute
JN via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Apr 16 02:03:21 PDT 2014
On Wednesday, 16 April 2014 at 01:57:29 UTC, Mike wrote:
> I don't believe users hesitant to use D will suddenly come to D
> now that there is a @nogc attribute. I also don't believe they
> want to avoid the GC, even if they say they do. I believe what
> they really want is to have an alternative to the GC.
I'd have to agree. I doubt @nogc will change anything, people
will just start complaining about limitations of @nogc (no array
concat, having to use own libraries which may be incompatible
with phobos). The complaints mostly come from the fact that D
wants to offer a choice, in other languages people just accept
what they have. You don't see C# developers complaining much
about having to use GC, or C++ programmers all over the world
asking for GC. Well, most of the new games (Unity3D) are done in
C# nowadays and people live with it even though game development
is one of the biggest C++ loving and GC hating crowd there is.
Another issue is the quality of D garbage collector, but adding
alternative memory management ways doesn't help, fragmenting the
codebase.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list