DIP60: @nogc attribute

Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Wed Apr 16 16:20:07 PDT 2014


On 4/16/2014 3:42 PM, Adam Wilson wrote:
> ARC may in fact be the most advantageous for a specific use case, but that in no
> way means that all use cases will see a performance improvement, and in all
> likelihood, may see a decrease in performance.

Right on. Pervasive ARC is very costly, meaning that one will have to define 
alongside it all kinds of schemes to mitigate those costs, all of which are 
expensive for the programmer to get right.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list