DIP60: @nogc attribute

[bearophile via Digitalmars-d]

Ola Fosheim Grøstad:

> Where this falls apart is when you introduce a compacting GC 
> and the @nogc code is run in a real time priority thread. Then 
> you need both @nogc_function_calls and @nogc_memory .

Perhaps the @nogc proposal is not flexible enough. So probably 
the problem needs to be looked from a higher distance to find a 
smarter and more flexible solution. Koka and other ideas appeared 
in this thread can be seeds for ideas.

Bye,
bearophile