Size_t on x86 is uint,on x64 is ulong,it's a good thing?
Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d
digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Thu Apr 17 14:27:09 PDT 2014
On 4/17/2014 12:36 PM, FrankLike wrote:
> Size_t on x86 is uint,on x64 is ulong,it's a good thing?
>
> I don't think is ok.
> it creates many convert thing,such as length is ulong ,must cast to
> int or cast to uint. It will be waste of time ,I think.
>
>
If you want fixed-length, you use uint/ulong/etc. The whole point of
size_t is for when you need the hardware's native data size.
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list