What's the status of old-style operator overloads in D2?

Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d at puremagic.com
Tue Apr 22 11:17:43 PDT 2014


On Tue, 22 Apr 2014 14:15:21 -0400, Daniel Murphy  
<yebbliesnospam at gmail.com> wrote:

> "Steven Schveighoffer"  wrote in message  
> news:op.xeqcf3vbeav7ka at stevens-macbook-pro-2.local...
>
>> If the old behavior can be exactly mimiced, I think we can get rid of  
>> the old behavior.
>
> Can != Should

Sorry I misspoke. We *should* :)

>> Less code in the compiler, less complexity in the language.
>
> More complexity in user code.

A mixin statement is not complexity.

-Steve


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list