What's the status of old-style operator overloads in D2?

[Meta via Digitalmars-d]

On Tuesday, 22 April 2014 at 15:50:21 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
> "Andrej Mitrovic"  wrote in message 
> news:ifghzjafvfqrqkhlpinc at forum.dlang.org...
>
>> Old-style operator overloads (such as opCom, opAnd, etc) have 
>> largely been superseded by new-style templated operator 
>> overloads (opUnary, opBinary, etc).
>
> I prefer the old ones mainly because the names are better and 
> the code easier to read.  When you are implementing one 
> operator per function (ie most of the time) the extra template 
> syntax is just unnecessary noise.
>
> T opMul(T other)
>
> vs
>
> T opBinary(string op : "*")(T other)
>
> The old names were chosen to match what the operations were 
> supposed to be, not for the syntax.  In that regard the new 
> syntax is a step backwards.

Does this work if test is in a different module from main?

struct test
{
	private int opBinary(string op: "*")(test other) { return 3; }
	public alias opMul = opBinary!"*";
}

void main()
{
	test t1 = test();
	test t2 = test();
	auto n = t1 * t2;
	assert(n == 3);
}