Discusssion on the Discussion of the Design for a new GC

[Leandro Lucarella via Digitalmars-d]

On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 14:15:45 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 April 2014 at 10:14:07 UTC, Kagamin wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 23 April 2014 at 18:35:26 UTC, Messenger wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 23 April 2014 at 15:33:36 UTC, Orvid King wrote:
>>>> After all of that, I intend to include a base draft of the 
>>>> design of the GC, along with opening the PRs and committing 
>>>> the starting API. So, is there something I’m missing? Am I 
>>>> overlooking the obvious? Is there a more practical way to 
>>>> produce the same results?
>>>
>>> What is the state of Rainer Schütze's precise gc? Duplication 
>>> of effort and all that.
>>
>> Also CDGC http://www.llucax.com.ar/proj/dgc/
>
> Ah, I hadn't realized he had actually implemented the 
> concurrent GC he gave a talk on

Haha, you thought I was just inventing the numbers?!? :D